H.R. 3447119th CongressIn markupLatest action Mar 26, 2026Decoded by AI · checked against the record
The plain-language version leads. The official text is always the reference.
HR 3447 requires location-tracking technology in advanced exported chips within 180 days and mandates reporting if chips are moved or tampered with.
60-second read · 4 questions answered below
The Chip Security Act requires the Commerce Department to add location-tracking technology to advanced chips covered by U.S. export rules before they are sold or shipped abroad. Companies that export these chips must immediately report to the government if a chip is moved to an unauthorized location, handed to an unauthorized user, or tampered with. The law also directs the Commerce Department to study and potentially require additional features such as disabling tools or usage-verification methods, with findings due to Congress within one year and approved measures rolled out within two years after that.
The bill primarily affects U.S. companies that manufacture or export advanced semiconductors and AI chips already subject to U.S. export controls. Foreign businesses and governments that purchase these chips are also affected, as chips could be monitored for location and usage.
The tracking and reporting requirements would create new compliance obligations for chip exporters and expand government visibility into where high-end chips go after sale. Annual reviews of security technology are required for three years following implementation, meaning requirements could continue to evolve and affect the global supply of chips used in data centers, AI systems, and advanced computing products.
AI-drafted summary. Verify it against the official text before you act on it. Read the official bill on Congress.gov
Right now: a House committee is reviewing it. If the Senate changes it, it goes back to the House before reaching the President.
Latest action: — Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 42 - 0.
Coverage of this bill from across the press — each outlet's political lean labeled where AllSides has rated it, and marked "Not rated" where it hasn't.
Newest of these articles:
economictimes.indiatimes.com
Not rated
propakistani.pk
Not rated
Lean labels describe the news outlet, not this bill or any party. Ratings by AllSides.