Resolution would scrap CFPB rule limiting big bank overdraft fees
Placed on the calendarH.J.Res. 59Latest action
Sponsor: J. French Hill · Representative · AR
AIDecoded by AI · checked against the recordRead the official text
Official title: Disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions".
119th Congress
Topics: Jobs & the economy
Introduced:
Read the official bill on Congress.govIn plain words
The plain-language version comes first. The official text is always the reference.
This bill would cancel the CFPB's 2024 rule limiting overdraft fees at banks with over $10 billion in assets.
45-second read · 4 questions answered below
What does this do?
This bill would cancel a CFPB rule issued in December 2024 that regulated overdraft fees at "very large financial institutions," generally banks with more than $10 billion in assets. Using the , it would void the rule entirely and bar the CFPB from issuing a substantially similar rule without new congressional authorization.
Who does it affect?
Customers of large banks who overdraw their checking accounts, and the large banks themselves that would have faced new fee limits and compliance requirements. Smaller banks and credit unions are not directly affected.
Why does it matter?
If passed, large banks would avoid new limits on overdraft fees and would not have to treat certain fees as loans subject to consumer lending protections. Customers of those banks would lose the fee caps and protections the rule would have provided.
AI-drafted summary. Check it against the official text before you act on it.
Read the official bill on Congress.govMake the call
Where does it stand?
- IntroducedFeb 13, 2025
- House committee
- House voteYou are here · Mar 21, 2025
- Senate
- The president's desk
Right now: it was placed on the , and the official record shows no floor action on it since. If the Senate changes it, it goes back to the House before reaching the president.
Latest action: — Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 16.
See how a call works
How it's being covered
Coverage of this bill from across the press. Each outlet's political lean is labeled where AllSides has rated it, and marked "Not rated" where it has not.
Newest of these articles:
Coverage of this bill so far comes from one side of the spectrum. Read it with that in mind.
cnet.com
Not rated
abcnews.go.com
Leans left
Lean labels describe the news outlet, not this bill or any party. Ratings by AllSides.