Bill would bar federal funds from building permanent Supreme Court fencing

What does this do?

HR 9038 would prohibit the use of federal funds to install new permanent fencing around the Supreme Court building or its grounds in Washington, D.C. Existing fencing present when the law is signed could still be repaired or replaced with federal money. The bill does not restrict temporary fencing, only permanent structures.

Who does it affect?

The bill directly affects federal agencies responsible for funding and managing Supreme Court security. Members of the public who visit or demonstrate near the Court would also be affected by whether a permanent barrier is erected.

Why does it matter?

If enacted, the bill would prevent permanent barriers from being built around what supporters describe as a landmark civic space, keeping it visually and physically accessible to the public. At the same time, the bill limits security options available to those responsible for protecting the justices and the building.

What does it cost, and who pays?

• Federal funds banned for new permanent fencing
• Repair of existing fencing still allowed
• No direct financial impact on the public

Where does it stand?