Data centers of 100 MW or more would pay full grid upgrade costs under House-passed bill
Floor activityH.R. 9340Latest action
Sponsor: Gabe Evans · Representative · CO
AIDecoded by AI · checked against the recordRead the official text
Official title: Ratepayer Protection Act
119th Congress
Topics: Environment & energy
Introduced:
Read the official bill on Congress.govIn plain words
The plain-language version comes first. The official text is always the reference.
House-passed HR 9340 would make data centers of 100 megawatts or more pay the full cost of grid upgrades built to serve them; the Senate has yet to act.
70-second read · 5 questions answered below
What does this do?
HR 9340 asks that electricity rates for very large data centers be designed so the customer pays the full extra cost of new power plants, lines, or equipment needed to serve it, including if it later cancels or stops buying power. Utilities would have to require money or other financial guarantees before building the upgrades. It works through a 1978 law asking state regulators and non-state-regulated utilities to consider the standard, with one year to begin and two years to decide.
Who does it affect?
It covers business customers whose facilities mainly run computer equipment for data storage and computing, with combined peak demand of 100 megawatts or more at one site or campus, who ask for or sign contracts after the bill becomes law. Data center operators, electric utilities, state regulators, and other utility customers would be most directly affected.
Why does it matter?
Utilities would no longer be left with upgrade costs if a large customer cancels or stops buying power, which affects how costs are recovered from other customers. States and utilities with a similar rule already in place, a hearing held, or a legislative vote would not have to start over.
What does it cost, and who pays?
- Customer pays full upgrade cost
- Covers later contract cancellation
- Financial guarantee required before building
AI-drafted summary. Check it against the official text before you act on it.
Based on the “Placed on Calendar Senate” text of Sep 24, 2026.
Read the official bill on Congress.govMake the call
Where does it stand?
- IntroducedJun 18, 2026
- House committee
- House vote
- SenateYou are here · Sep 30, 2026
- The president's desk
Right now: the Senate has not agreed to take it up. The last motion to do so failed. If the Senate changes it, it goes back to the House before reaching the president.
Latest action: — Motion to proceed to consideration of measure withdrawn in Senate. (CR S5199)
Recorded votes
Roll-call votes recorded since January 3, 2025.
Senate · · Roll call 254
As recorded
- Question
- On H.R. 9340
- Result:
- Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected
- 57
- Nay
- 43
- 0
- 0
Republicans 53 yes · Democrats 4 yes, 41 no · Independents 2 no
Official recordHow members voted
The official record lists how each member voted.Official record
House · · Roll call 312
As recorded
- Question
- On Motion to and Pass, as Amended
- Result:
- Passed
- 417
- Nay
- 3
- 0
- 12
Republicans 210 yes, 7 not voting · Democrats 206 yes, 3 no, 5 not voting · Independent 1 yes
Official recordHow members voted
The official record lists how each member voted.Official record
See how a call works
How it's being covered
Coverage of this bill from across the press. Each outlet's political lean is labeled where AllSides has rated it, and marked "Not rated" where it has not.
Newest of these articles:
Coverage of this bill so far comes from one side of the spectrum. Read it with that in mind.
airedale.futurecdn.net
Not rated
breitbart.com
Leans right
koat.com
Not rated
thegatewaypundit.com
Leans right
westernjournal.com
Leans right
Lean labels describe the news outlet, not this bill or any party. Ratings by AllSides.