Congressional resolution voids rule protecting underwater archaeological sites
Signed into lawS.J.Res. 11Latest action
Sponsor: John Kennedy · Senator · LA
AIDecoded by AI · checked against the recordRead the official text
Official title: A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management relating to "Protection of Marine Archaeological Resources".
119th Congress
Topics: Environment & energy
Introduced:
Read the official bill on Congress.govIn plain words
The plain-language version comes first. The official text is always the reference.
Congress killed BOEM's rule protecting underwater shipwrecks and artifacts from offshore energy projects.
40-second read · 4 questions answered below
What does this do?
This resolution cancels a BOEM regulation finalized in September 2024 called "Protection of Marine Archaeological Resources," which set rules for identifying and protecting historically significant underwater sites like shipwrecks from offshore energy projects. It was passed using the , which lets Congress overturn recent agency rules with a vote. The rule is now treated as if it never took effect.
Who does it affect?
Offshore oil, gas, and wind energy companies that would have followed the rule's protection procedures; also historians, archaeologists, and preservation groups relying on it.
Why does it matter?
BOEM can no longer enforce the specific protections for underwater archaeological sites during offshore energy projects. The agency is also generally barred from creating a substantially similar rule unless Congress passes new legislation allowing it.
AI-drafted summary. Check it against the official text before you act on it.
Read the official bill on Congress.govNo call to make
This is law.
Where does it stand?
- IntroducedFeb 4, 2025
- Senate committee
- Senate vote
- House
- The president's desk
Right now: the president signed it. It's law.Now law
Latest action: — Became Public Law No: 119-3.
Recorded votes
Roll-call votes recorded since January 3, 2025.
House · · Roll call 61
As recorded
- Question
- On Passage
- Result:
- Passed
- 221
- Nay
- 202
- 1
- 8
Republicans 212 yes, 1 no, 1 present, 4 not voting · Democrats 9 yes, 201 no, 4 not voting
Official recordHow members voted
The official record lists how each member voted.Official record
Senate · · Roll call 92
As recorded
- Question
- On the S.J.Res. 11
- Result:
- Joint Resolution Passed
- 54
- Nay
- 44
- 0
- 2
Republicans 51 yes, 2 not voting · Democrats 3 yes, 42 no · Independents 2 no
Official recordHow members voted
The official record lists how each member voted.Official record
Senate · · Roll call 91
As recorded
- Question
- On the S.J.Res. 11
- Result:
- Motion to Proceed Agreed to
- 54
- Nay
- 42
- 0
- 4
Republicans 51 yes, 2 not voting · Democrats 3 yes, 40 no, 2 not voting · Independents 2 no
Official recordHow members voted
The official record lists how each member voted.Official record