Bill would lock 9/11 security fee into aviation security spending only
Passed one chamberH.R. 8770Latest action
Sponsor: Dale W. Strong · Representative · AL
AIDecoded by AI · checked against the recordRead the official text
Official title: SAFEGUARDS Act of 2026
119th Congress
Topics: Jobs & the economy
Introduced:
Read the official bill on Congress.govIn plain words
The plain-language version comes first. The official text is always the reference.
Starting in fiscal 2028, the bill requires at least $750 million yearly from the 9/11 fee to go to two dedicated aviation security funds.
55-second read · 5 questions answered below
What does this do?
The SAFEGUARDS Act of 2026 requires that money from the 9/11 Security Fee on airline tickets be used only for aviation security purposes. Starting in 2028, at least $500 million a year must go to the Aviation Security Capital Fund, and at least $250 million a year must go to a new Aviation Security Checkpoint Technology Fund. It also states that using the fee for unrelated government spending should stop by 2027.
Who does it affect?
Airline passengers, who pay the fee through ticket prices, and the TSA, airports, and security technology companies, who would receive dedicated funding through the two funds.
Why does it matter?
The change would redirect existing fee revenue away from other government uses and toward security equipment, staffing, and technology upgrades, affecting how the fee's proceeds are allocated going forward.
What does it cost, and who pays?
- No new taxes created
- $500M/year to Capital Fund
- $250M/year to Checkpoint Tech Fund
AI-drafted summary. Check it against the official text before you act on it.
Read the official bill on Congress.govMake the call
Where does it stand?
- IntroducedMay 12, 2026
- House committee
- House vote
- SenateYou are here · Jul 14, 2026
- The president's desk
Right now: it passed the House, and the official record shows nothing new since. If the Senate changes it, it goes back to the House before reaching the president.
Latest action: — Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
See how a call works
How it's being covered
Coverage of this bill from across the press. Each outlet's political lean is labeled where AllSides has rated it, and marked "Not rated" where it has not.
Newest of these articles:
Coverage of this bill so far comes from one side of the spectrum. Read it with that in mind.
hotelresource.com
Not rated
washingtontimes.com
Leans right
Why the US needs the SAFEGUARDS ActMay 19, 2026
Lean labels describe the news outlet, not this bill or any party. Ratings by AllSides.