Holders of federal-land water routes could use them for aquifer recharge with 30 days' notice

What does this do?

The bill would let holders of existing rights-of-way or permits on federal land use those routes for aquifer recharge, for themselves or for a state, local government, tribe, or other public entity. It says recharge use is not an expansion, a modification, or a "major federal action," so it would not trigger the extra federal reviews those actions often require. Permit holders must notify the Bureau of Land Management at least 30 days ahead, naming the user, the existing permit, the recharge use, and including a copy of their agreement.

Who does it affect?

Water districts, irrigation companies, local governments, and tribes that hold permits to carry water across federal land, especially in western states, would be most affected. Farmers and communities that rely on underground water supplies could also be affected, and the Bureau of Land Management would handle the new notices.

Why does it matter?

Recharge uses on existing routes would not need a new federal approval or the added reviews tied to major federal actions. The bill does not excuse anyone from the Clean Water Act, the Endangered Species Act, or the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, and it gives no authority to build, change, or expand canals or other structures.

What does it cost, and who pays?

• No extra BLM rent for recharge
• For-profit users still pay